Category Archives: electronic gadgets

Corded Phones

My NT Vista 350Northern Telecom Vista 350

Growing up in Toronto in the 80s and 90s meant that my telecom provider at home was Bell.

While you used to be able to buy phones, you also could rent them. For numerous reasons (mostly because Bell was a corporate brother to Northern Telecom) Bell had “NT” phones.

And damn, those phones were good. I should say ARE good.

Upon return to Canada back in ‘97, I purchased from London Drugs a refurbished Northern Telecom (the older branding of ‘Nortel’) Vista 350 for what I recall as nearly $100. My lovely wife mocked me. She said it was a waste of money and had those horrible things called cords.

13 years later.

In those 13 years probably 3 or 4 sets of cordless phones have arrived and departed because they sucked or died, or both.

I just finished working from home for a week, using my Vista 350 phone making 20-30 calls a day.

Without fail, every phone call was perfect. The buttons are clearly labeled, and each operation worked as I expected them.

Conversely, my client’s office uses an Avaya PBX with expensive handsets. But no one really know’s to use them. I’m sure it has a ton of features, but it’s so damn non-intuitive, no one tries. It’s fairly common to see people on their cell phones, while sitting at their desks.

My Vista 350, with fewer buttons than the ugly Avaya (i.e. Lucent) permits a multitude of seemingly obvious tasks with ease:

  • Call Display (Name AND number; that Avaya only does number)
  • Scrollable Caller list (Avaya doesn’t have one)
  • Maintain a directory of phone numbers and names (Avaya is a no go)
  • Add a recent caller to a the directory (Avaya can’t do that)
  • Redial last few dialled numbers (nope for Avaya)
  • Put caller on hold, make new call, connect callers (I fail every time on the Avaya)
  • Visual ringing (bright blinking red light which his handy when kids Nintendo Wii is blaring)
  • Awesome speakerphone

And this phone is well over 15 years old and it works without power.

(Oddly, these are all things that an iPhone with similar grace.)

But try and buy a phone like my Vista 350 today.

No luck, FutureShop carries a single corded model. Telus makes no indication they sell corded telephones on their web-site.

Though I’m happy to see that Bell still sells a child of my phone the Aastra 390.

It Just Works — the phone on my desk.

Google Voice

Google purchased a company many years ago called Grand Central, an aptly named company that gives you a new phone number, performs a few tricks and goes a long way to making your choice of phone company irrelevant.

Not available in Canada (yet) and available in an invitation only mode in the US, Google Voice has made your phone service (be it landline or wireless) a commodity.
4232368305-voice_logo_smMost people who have a phone also have a computer. So why is it that the only integration that exists between your phone and your computer is the fact you can get an email with your monthly bill along with some online account maintenance?

Where’s my Rogers or AT&T voice mail delivered to my email box? It’s 2009 folks!

Why can’t I send an SMS from my computer as if it came from my phone? (I sure can type a LOT faster on my computer than my phone.)

Why can’t I auto-magically send certain callers to voice mail, or certain callers to ring my phone at home?

Google Voice does all of that. For free (for now).

It seamlessly integrates your voice mail, your SMS ‘life’, your address book, the multiple phone lines in your life between your computer and your phone and makes the actual phone companies you use nothing more than a carrier of bits.

The sad part is that the the big wireless customers had the ability to implement many similar services but failed to take advantage of the opportunity.

The cat’s out of the bag. Google Voice — it just works.

Eco Mist Solutions – Plasma & LCD Cleaner review

What is there to say about a spray cleaner that comes in a bottle and works as advertised?  You’d think not much, and you’d be wrong!

One thing I keep hearing. “Don’t use Windex or an ammonia based cleaner on your LCD or Plasma screens!” Why? Well, from what I can ascertain the ammonia will eventually break down the anti-glare coating and etch the surface.  Not idea.  So what to use?  With all of the screen cleaners out there today, this one caught my eye for a few reasons.

1. Eco Mist Solutions Plasma & LCD Cleaner is very eco friendly.  It’s made of stuff that you can pronounce, and could eat if so desired.  Check this ingredient list:

  • Non-chlorinated water
  • Sugarcane
  • Processed coconut extract
  • Grains

Like Chris Rock once said about cornbread, “Ain’t nuttin’ wrong with that!”.  Check out this MSDS sheet (PDF).  It might as well be water!

2. It’s inexpensive.  The Bastard likes.

I counted the number of LDC screens in my house.  I lost count at 8.  Between the TV, computers and cell phone screens there are far far too many to be throwing down $40 a bottle on that crap that MonsterCable produces to keep them all clean. For less than $6 you can pick up the Eco Mist product at your local Home Depot, and I get the impression that it will last a long time as you don’t need to use much and it comes in a 650ML bottle.

Sugarcane on my TV scrayne?

3. It actually does what it says!

One thing I did notice though.  It’s not great at getting stubborn debris or water-mark type stains off the screen.  You need to use a well dampened cloth and a bit of pressure and it will eventually lift.  Make sure you are using a soft cloth and that you’ve cleaned the area first so no dust is present before you start working on that stubborn spot.  You certianly don’t want to scratch that 50″ Aquos now, do you?

Backup a sec!… Sugarcane?! On my TV screen?  So I hit the cloth with a shot and wiped the screen.  Clean as a whistle, no streaks and it’s not sticky at all.  So what component of sugarcane are they using?  Can someone please enlighten me?  Interestingly, it doesn’t taste like anything.  Yes, I tasted it.

Hey Trini!  Guess what?  It Just Works!

(works great on the PlayStation 3 plastic as well!)

Labeling the paper towel dispenser

As a very frequent travelerimg_47701, I see a lot of paper towel dispensers.

Most of them represent the worst in design.

A good designer can make even complex mechanical objects simple to use. But why is this so rarely applied to paper towel dispensers?

I have a rule, if you need to label a paper towel dispenser, you have failed as a designer. (For that matter, if you need to label a door ‘Push or Pull’ you have truly failed.)

The dispenser pictured failed on two accounts.

1) The “Pull with both hands” should be a reminder to the user that the designers failed to take into account that a users hands are often wet when grabbing the sliver of exposed paper towel. As a result, the towel will fail to retain that modicum of strength required to get the towel out.

2) Once that sliver of exposed paper towel disappears the user requires additional instruction to turn the knob on the side of the dispenser to get more paper towel.

This is not an old dispenser, I took a picture of this dispenser in a recently renovated bathroom in the Portland, Oregon airport.

Contrast this with the paper towel dispenser now seen more and more often, the Georgia-Pacific enMotion.

59460A picture of a waving hand in front of a small window is all that the user needs to know about how to operate this dispenser. Such a dispenser works, and works well.

Though I’m biased (I worked with Georgia-Pacific for over a year in the early 2000’s) but also had the opportunity to have lunch (in a diner in Green Bay, WI) with the designers of this paper towel dispenser and learned how well it is designed.

  1. “D” cell – This thing runs on a single ‘D’ cell battery, and should last over a year on a single battery.
  2. The plastic is barely see-through. Why? The user can see if the paper towel has ran out and can move on to another dispenser, but not get distracted by it’s mechanical contents.
  3. Length – Settings inside the dispenser control how much paper towel is dispensed each time.
  4. Wait – Settings inside the dispenser control how long the user must wait until the next towel.
  5. Pre or Post – An additional setting controls whether a towel should be ‘at the ready’ or spit out when the user activates it.

As a result, the dispenser can be setup to prevent that ‘4 foot paper towel guy’ to dry damp hands or customized to keep nicely square towels on the ready for a kitchen.

It’s very economical to operate, looks cool and the user is usually left not even aware they had an encounter with a paper towel dispenser. This is a function of good design.

I hope that you’ll never see a paper towel dispenser in the same way again.

- The Traveling Trini

The best RSS News Feed Reader!

The Travelling Trini is travelling today, to Trinidad.

As I passed through the airline lounge lobby I was reminded of the best RSS reader, ever!

This RSS reader has solved almost everything that drags down most readers. It prioritizes, reflects local priorities, has incredibly relevant advertising, appropriate pictures and diagrams, is divided itself into multiple sections, never duplicates news items and can be read ‘during take-off and landing.’

paperIt’s been under development continually for several hundred years. But alas the newspaper as we know it, may not be around much longer.

It’s very depressing to hear of newspapers unable to make a ‘go’ of it these days. And I don’t see how reading news on a computer, or even a phone is better.

In the incredibly rich info-world we live in, if I want to find out what is likely to be important, what I need to know, what is locally relevant and never read the same news item twice; I read my local newspaper. There is a good chance that a professional news gathering and editorial team will do a better job than I can.

Sure there is plenty of reason to subscribe to vastly technical and geeky newsfeeds about your obscure interests. But how a web page or software program is going to piece together a summary of the news of the day, ensure it is in the same voice and deliver in for pennies I’ll never know.

The best part?

I can ignore the “please store your computers, iPods and phones” for takeoff and landing bit.

Apple’s new iPod Shuffle

WTF Apple?  Okay, I get it.  Apple fanboys/girls are used to paying a bit more for your product, but at least it met The Scot’s minimum QPR (Quality:Price Ratio).  It’s a non-scientific/gut feel measurement, and yes it’s metric.  The new iPod Shuffle (released March 11/2009) loses the controls found previously on earlier models, and moves them to the wire on the ear buds.  I have a few problems with this approach:

  1. The controls are no longer intuitive.  This post over at Engadget sums it up best.

    stick it in yer ear Apple!

    stick it in yer ear Apple!

  2. The Scot’s ears are too damn big/genetically fucked up for your stupid ear buds!  They fall out constantly.
  3. If an adapter for 3rd party headphones becomes available, the $99 (CAD) Shuffle will undoubtedly approach the $149 4th generation iPod Nano — WHICH HAS A SCREEN AND PROPER BUTTONS!  Which brings me to my next point…
  4. Apple is attempting to make green it’s product line.  If I have to go out and buy another set of headphones and an adapter I’ve just significantly increased the carbon footprint of the diminutive little Shuffle.

The Scot’s Recommendation?  Buy the $149 (CAD) 8GB Nano! The Nano sits in The Scot’s QPR quite nicely.  It has twice the storage capacity as the new Shuffle.  It has a screen, and you can watch video on it!  It has proper controls.

What’s next Apple?  The iPod iMplant?  Reminds me of a Saturday Night Live sketch.

Oh, and the Scot’s wife has a Nano (iPod, ahem) and she loves it!

<UPDATE!> The 3rd party accessories for the $99 iPod Shuffle are starting to appear.  $49 extra for “better dynamic range”? Sigh…